retina

Loss of Motor Protein MYO1C Causes Rhodopsin Mislocalization and Results in Impaired Visual Function

AUTHORS

Ashish K. Solanki, Manas R. Biswal, Stephen Walterhouse, René Martin, Altaf A. Kondkar, Hans-Joachim Knölker, Bushra Rahman, Ehtesham Arif, Shahid Husain, Sandra R. Montezuma, Deepak Nihalani, Glenn Prazere Lobo

ABSTRACT

Unconventional myosins, linked to deafness, are also proposed to play a role in retinal cell physiology. However, their direct role in photoreceptor function remains unclear. We demonstrate that systemic loss of the unconventional myosin MYO1C in mice, specifically causes rhodopsin mislocalization, leading to impaired visual function. Electroretinogram analysis of Myo1c knockout (Myo1c-KO) mice showed a progressive loss of photoreceptor function. Immunohistochemistry and binding assays demonstrated MYO1C localization to photoreceptor inner and outer segments (OS) and identified a direct interaction of rhodopsin with MYO1C. In Myo1c-KO retinas, rhodopsin mislocalized to rod inner segments (IS) and cell bodies, while cone opsins in OS showed punctate staining. In aged mice, the histological and ultrastructural examination of the phenotype of Myo1c-KO retinas showed progressively shorter photoreceptor OS. These results demonstrate that MYO1C is important for rhodopsin localization to the photoreceptor OS, and for normal visual function.

The Relationship Between Macula Retinal Ganglion Cell Density and Visual Function in the Nonhuman Primate

AUTHORS

Kwame Antwi-Boasiako; Louvenia Carter-Dawson; Ronald Harwerth; Margaret Gondo; Nimesh Patel

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Loss of ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) and visual sensitivity in the macula region are known to occur at all stages of glaucoma. While both are dependent on the underlying retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), the relationship between structure and function is modest. We hypothesize that the imprecise relationship is due to a lack of direct correspondence between in vivo measures and RGC counts, as well as the relatively large stimulus size used by standard perimetry, which exceeds spatial summation.

Methods: The relationship between optical coherence tomography (OCT)–derived GCIPL thickness and corresponding inner cell density from retinal flat mounts was determined for four nonhuman primates with varying stages of neuropathy. Normative data for 10-2 threshold using Goldman size I to V stimuli were established for 10 animals, 4 of which were then followed longitudinally with OCT and perimetry. The relationship between GCIPL volume, which incorporated stimulus size after removal of residual thickness, and differential light sensitivity was determined for both experimental glaucoma and healthy eyes.

Results: Peak inner retinal cell density was 63,052 ± 9238 cells/mm2 in the healthy eye. Cell density was related to both GCIPL thickness and eccentricity (R2 = 0.74, P < .01). For all 10-2 eccentricities, size III stimuli were greater than the critical area (P < 0.01). Based on the structural and histologic relationship, the critical area corresponds to approximately 156 RGCs.

Conclusions: The relationship between cell density and GCIPL thickness is dependent on retinal eccentricity. For 10-2 perimetry, perimetric loss, especially at earlier stages of neuropathy, may best be detected using size II or smaller stimuli.